Rabu, 08 Mei 2019

Americans have 'incredible' misconceptions about Social Security - Fox Business

Older Americans – including current and future retirees – appear to have a meaningful lack of knowledge about Social Security and how it can boost their retirement income streams, according to a new report from the Nationwide Retirement Institute.

Continue Reading Below

“What’s a little disappointing is that there continues to be an incredible number of misconceptions about Social Security,” Tina Ambrozy, president of financial distribution at Nationwide, told FOX Business. “The report showed that people really don’t understand the way Social Security works … [down to] even understanding what your income would be.”

MORE FROM FOXBUSINESS.COM...

People tend to grossly overestimate the size of their Social Security checks, the results showed. Future retirees expect to receive $1,805 in monthly benefits – but yet retirees currently collecting receive $1,408, on average – a 28 percent difference.

Ambrozy said that disconnect is “alarming,” but findings also reveal that some people believe if you begin collecting at age 62, your check will actually increase when you reach age 65. In fact, the reduction of benefits for those who claim at 62 is 25 percent, 20 percent for those that claim at 63, 13.3 percent at age 64 and 6.7 percent at 65.

The average age current retirees started collecting was 62. However, delaying when you collect, when possible, can actually increase a worker’s benefit by as much as 32 percent.

Meanwhile, about 25 percent of people think they can live on Social Security alone – even though the program was designed to be supplemental, not the primary form of retirement income.

As previously reported by FOX Business, the annual trustees report forecast that Social Security will not be able to pay full benefits by 2035, at which time trustees predict the program’s reserve funds will be depleted. At that time, only 80 percent of the benefits will be payable.

Only 8 percent of people were able to identify the factors that determine the maximum benefit an individual can receive – including work history, age, benefits start date and marital status.

The lack of knowledge – and planning – has barely changed in the six years Nationwide has been conducting the survey, Ambrozy noted.

While a little less than half of people said they were confident or very confident in their Social Security knowledge, when asked specific questions, people didn’t always know the answers.

Only 30 percent of people know that if they don’t work for at least 35 years, their benefit will be reduced. Only a slightly higher percentage of people knew that someone earning $150,000 pays as much in Social Security taxes as a millionaire. Less than half of respondents knew Social Security is protected against inflation, while about one-third of people thought benefits are tax-free.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX BUSINESS APP

Working with a financial adviser, however, has proven to help. According to the survey, those who worked with an expert saw 15 percent greater lifetime income benefits – $1,551 versus $1,324.

The survey was conducted online Feb. 11-21 among more than 1,300 people, including pre-retirees (ages 50-plus), recent retirees and people who have been retired for at least 10 years.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/americans-misconceptions-social-security

2019-05-08 12:50:27Z
52780289317164

General Motors, Unifor to make Oshawa announcement - Toronto Sun

Uber, Lyft drivers protest in cities across the U.S. - CBC.ca

Drivers for ride-hailing giants Uber and Lyft turned off their apps to protest what they say are declining wages at a time when both companies are raking in billions of dollars from investors.

Demonstrations took place Wednesday in 10 U.S. cities, including Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco and Washington, as well as some European locations like London.

The protests arrived just ahead of Uber's initial public stock offering, which is planned for Friday. Uber hopes to raise $9 billion US and is expected to be valued at up to $91.5 billion.

Strikes seen before

It's not the first time drivers for ride-hailing apps have staged protests. Strikes were planned in several cities ahead of Lyft's IPO last month, although the disruption to riders appeared to be minimal. More cities are participating in Wednesday's protest, however.

"Drivers built these billion-dollar companies and it is just plain wrong that so many continue to be paid poverty wages while Silicon Valley investors get rich off their labour," Brendan Sexton, executive director of the Independent Drivers Guild, said in a statement. "All drivers deserve fair pay."

In New York, some drivers went offline between 7 and 9 a.m. ET, though it was still easy to locate a driver during rush hour near Wall Street in lower Manhattan on Wednesday.

Drivers in Los Angeles are participating in a 24-hour strike and picket line at Los Angeles International Airport.

Uber, in a prepared statement Wednesday, said it is constantly working to improve the working environment for drivers.

"Drivers are at the heart of our service — we can't succeed without them — and thousands of people come into work at Uber every day focused on how to make their experience better, on and off the road."

Lyft said its drivers' hourly earnings have increased over the last two years, that 75 per cent of its drivers work less than 10 hours per week to supplement existing jobs and drivers earn over $20 US an hour on average.

"We know that access to flexible, extra income makes a big difference for millions of people, and we're constantly working to improve how we can best serve our driver community," Lyft said.

In New York, striking drivers organized a caravan across the Brooklyn Bridge, and are holding a rally outside Uber and Lyft offices in Queens.

Labor actions also took place in Atlanta, Boston, Philadelphia, San Diego and Stamford, Conn.



from Business - Latest - Google News http://bit.ly/3012t1v
via IFTTT
May 08, 2019 at 09:18PM

Soaring gas prices prompt B.C. premier John Horgan to request utilities commission investigate - Straight.com

Huawei CFO's extradition case: Everything you need to know - CNBC

Meng Wanzhou, Executive Board Director of the Chinese technology giant Huawei, attends a session of the VTB Capital Investment Forum "Russia Calling!" in Moscow, Russia October 2, 2014.

Alexander Bibik | Reuters

Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou is scheduled to appear at a court in Vancouver, Canada on Wednesday as she continues to fight against extradition to the U.S.

The hearing on Wednesday is one step in what legal experts said could be a long process.

Here's everything you need to know.

Why was Meng Wanzhou arrested?

In December, Meng was arrested in Canada at the request of the U.S. She has been under house arrest since.

Huawei and Meng were charged with bank and wire fraud and conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud in relation to skirting American sanctions on Iran.

The U.S. alleges that Meng lied to banks about Huawei's relationship with an unofficial subsidiary in Iran called Skycom in order to get banking services.

What is Huawei's response?

Huawei denied the allegations from the U.S.

"The company denies that it or its subsidiary or affiliate have committed any of the asserted violations of U.S. law set forth in each of the indictments, is not aware of any wrongdoing by Ms Meng, and believes the U.S. courts will ultimately reach the same conclusion," Huawei said in a statement in January.

The Chinese tech giant also said that it looked to discuss Meng's arrest with the U.S. Justice Department but that request "was rejected without explanation."

What is Wednesday's hearing about?

A decision on whether Meng will be extradited or not will not happen on Wednesday. Instead, it is likely to be a short affair in which a timetable for the next steps will be decided.

Leo Adler, a Toronto-based criminal lawyer with expertise in extradition cases, said Meng's defense is likely going to ask for "disclosure," which are documents and evidence the prosecution is using against the defendant.

"The defense will probably want more materials. The Crown attorneys, acting on behalf of the United States will probably be fighting that application for disclosure. They invariably do," Adler told CNBC by phone on Wednesday. "I anticipate that there will be a series of applications. They'll schedule them out and we will see what transpires."

What could Meng's lawyers argue?

Over the course of the extradition process, Meng's defense could set out a number of arguments, according to Adler.

Meng is accused of violating U.S. sanctions on Iran. Last year, the U.S. pulled out of the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran. That deal lifted sanctions on Iran but put limits on its nuclear program. But by pulling out, the U.S. restored those sanctions. However, Canada is still part of that deal. Therefore, even if what Meng allegedly did was illegal in the U.S., it may not be in Canada. This could be one argument used by Meng's lawyers.

Separately, Meng's defense has filed a lawsuit against Canadian authorities alleging the Huawei CFO was arrested and detained against her constitutional rights. Meng's lawyers could argue "this is an abuse of process, her rights were abused, if they were, the whole extradition case should be thrown out," Adler said.

Finally, Meng's defense could argue that the case is political in nature. It's taking place against the backdrop of the ongoing U.S.-China trade war. On top of that, America has accused Huawei of being a national security threat, alleging its networking equipment could be used for espionage by Beijing. Huawei denies that allegations.

U.S. President Donald Trump has hinted in the past that he could intervene in Meng's case if it helped seal a U.S.-China trade deal.

In a preliminary hearing in the British Columbia Supreme Court in Vancouver in March, one of Meng's lawyers raised concerns about the political nature of the extradition case.

"There are issues about the political character, political motivation, comments by the U.S. president," Richard Peck said.

"She can argue there appears to be a pre-disposition, an anti-Chinese pre-disposition and therefore this will be a witch trial because she is Chinese, because of the claim that Huawei is really part of the Chinese government and Chinese Communist Party and so she would never get a fair trial," Adler told CNBC.

Adler added that many of those arguments could come during a later part of the extradition hearings.

What's next?

After Wednesday's hearing, another court date will be set. It's a process that could take months — or even years.

There are also a number of appeal avenues which could draw out the final decision.



from Business - Latest - Google News https://cnb.cx/2WuEUvV
via IFTTT
May 08, 2019 at 12:19PM

How Trump's Tweets Are Transforming Oil Markets | OilPrice.com - OilPrice.com

You have to hand it to President Trump. He’s increasingly becoming the most indecisive president in U.S. history. His apparent and abrupt about-face on Sunday to increase tariffs on Chinese goods less than a week after claiming that trade talks were going well have caused global financial markets to convulse - sending both equities and global oil prices south.

However, the biggest concern for oil markets is the hit to economic growth and hence oil demand that will follow an uptick in tariffs on Chinese goods. Initial tariffs put in place last year on some $200 billion worth of Chinese goods had already caused economic stagnation globally, which also hurts global oil demand. Now that Trump has decided to increase tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods from 10 percent to a staggering 25 percent with another $300 billion possibly slated to be hit, the outcome for economic growth could be grim.

This puts major oil producers and exporters like Russia and Saudi Arabia in the crosshairs of any economic downturn. Just as the Saudi-led OPEC+ group of producers had come close to restoring global oil market equilibrium, with over a 30 percent increase in oil prices so far this year, fresh U.S. tariffs on China will cause Riyadh to have to change its oil production strategy once again in less than a year, and its due to Trump’s actions. Last fall, Saudi Arabia bowed to Trump pressure via Twitter to trim production and keep a lid on oil prices but was caught flatfooted when Trump unexpectedly announced in November his 180-day Iranian oil sanctions waiver for eight major importers of Iranian oil, including China, Indian and Japan. The decision, made without consulting with his Saudi allies, caused a rift in U.S.-Saudi relations and damaged Trump’s otherwise stellar relations with the royal family.

Since then, the kingdom has been reticent to move on further Trump Tweets over oil production. However, that started to change when Trump, again unexpectedly, announced two weeks ago that he would not extend the 180-day Iranian oil waivers, all the while hedging that Saudi Arabia and OPEC would make up the difference by increasing oil production. Riyadh didn’t immediately agree that it would make up the shortfall for the loss of more Iranian barrels from the market, but it also indicated it would likely cover the loss in time.

Related: Buffett’s Big Bet On Energy

Now Trump has presented the Saudis and other major oil producers with another quandary to grapple with - a weakened global economy that will ensue due to new sanction. Oil prices will trend downward again, well past the Saudi fiscal break-even point which is reportedly around the $70s per barrel mark, and cause the kingdom to nervously watch its coffers, hoping to not see a repeat of early 2016 when global oil prices dipped below the economically damaging $30 per barrel price point.

The Saudis are finding themselves increasingly formulating new oil production policy due to both overt Trump intervention in global oil markets as well as his other policies that hit global oil demand. While Riyadh is careful to adhere to its line of good relations with Washington, behind closed doors they must be exasperated with this American president, his ability to often and quickly change course and his use of Twitter as a presidential bull pulpit.

Trump’s increased tariffs on China may at the end of the day be warranted since Beijing was reportedly backpedaling from previous agreements it had made in ongoing trade talks with Washington, yet the collateral damage from a full-blown trade war between the world’s two largest economies could be cataclysmic.

By Tim Daiss for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



from Business - Latest - Google News http://bit.ly/2Jndwfv
via IFTTT
May 08, 2019 at 04:00AM

Uber drivers strike: drivers are striking across the world as Uber prepares IPO - Vox.com

Uber and Lyft drivers have been fighting for years for the right to unionize and negotiate better pay. So far, they’ve failed — but they’ve found another way to flex their power.

A loose network of ride-share drivers are on strike today, from San Diego all the way to São Paulo and Sydney. They’ve urged drivers to boycott ride-sharing applications for 24 hours Wednesday and to instead spend the day picketing to demand more money. They also want cities to regulate ride-hailing platforms the way New York City does.

The work stoppage comes two days before Uber’s long-awaited public debut Friday on the stock market, and that’s no coincidence. Drivers want company executives to know they are really, really unhappy.

Uber has been cutting driver pay rates in major cities to boost its bottom line as it prepares for its initial public offerings (IPO). That has infuriated drivers, who say they were already struggling to make ends meet. They are particularly incensed by the fact that Uber investors are expected to reap millions (even billions) of dollars from the IPO because of their labor.

“This is not fair; something has to change,” Karim Bayumi, a Los Angeles Uber driver, said in a video posted on Twitter. “What’s the point of flexibility if you have to work so much more, without getting paid more or overtime?”

Bayumi, who drives full time to support a family of three, is one of the drivers organizing the strike in LA with Rideshare Drivers United, an unofficial group of Uber and Lyft drivers advocating for policy changes. Other groups, like the Boston Independent Drivers Guild and Chicago Rideshare Advocates, are coordinating similar strikes.

What started with a call on social media has since spread to about a dozen US cities, including Atlanta, Philadelphia, Minneapolis, San Francisco, Washington, DC, and Dayton, Ohio. News of the strike has even inspired Uber drivers across the world. Groups of drivers in Kenya, Nigeria, Chile, Costa Rica, and the United Kingdom are striking too.

Each group has its own set of demands, but most want a firm cap on Uber’s commission from each ride, which varies widely but averages about 33 percent. Drivers in the US also want the company to reverse recent pay cuts, and to guarantee drivers $15 to $20 an hour in take-home pay. Right now, they earn an average of $10 to $12 an hour in the US, after expense, according to several researchers.

An Uber spokesperson didn’t comment on the strike but pointed out to Vox that the company is giving drivers bonuses ahead of the IPO.

“Drivers are at the heart of our service — we can’t succeed without them — and thousands of people come into work at Uber every day focused on how to make their experience better, on and off the road,” he wrote in a statement to Vox. “Whether it’s more consistent earnings, stronger insurance protections or fully funded four-year degrees for drivers or their families, we’ll continue working to improve the experience for and with drivers.”

It’s unclear how many drivers plan to take part in Wednesday’s stoppage, and whether they will change anything. Yet the event’s swift spread to major cities across the world marks a pivotal moment for the so-called gig economy, which relies heavily on workers with no labor protections or collective bargaining rights. Gig economy workers are starting to recognize they can organize and exert pressure even without a formal labor union.

Uber’s profit model, like all others in the gig economy, involves much more than providing a popular service to customers. It depends on all the money saved from skirting US labor laws.

By classifying drivers as independent contractors instead of employees, Uber doesn’t need to pay certain taxes, benefits, overtime, or minimum wages to tens of thousands of drivers. As self-employed contractors, drivers don’t have a legal right to form labor unions and negotiate contracts either.

Uber drivers have spent more than six years fighting the company in court, saying they’ve been intentionally misclassified. They argue that drivers should be considered employees because the company has so much control over their workday, including strict rules on their vehicle conditions, what rides they can take, and which routes to take.

Uber has fought back, maintaining that drivers are not employees because they set their own schedules and provide their own cars.

So far, the issue has not been resolved.

Last month, Uber settled the main court case with 13,600 Uber drivers, agreeing to pay them $20 million, but without changing their status as independent contractors. The other 350,000 drivers who were part of the initial class-action lawsuit had signed mandatory arbitration agreements, so a federal judge is requiring them to pursue their cases in a private forum, where they are less likely to win their case.

Any challenge to the drivers’ status as contractors threatens Uber’s bottom line, which is another reason the strikes are so significant.

Uber has been upfront with investors about the risk of a labor revolt. In a new Securities and Exchange Commission filing, Uber acknowledges that giving drivers the same legal rights as employees would “fundamentally change” the company’s financial model:

If, as a result of legislation or judicial decisions, we are required to classify Drivers as employees ... we would incur significant additional expenses for compensating Drivers, potentially including expenses associated with the application of wage and hour laws (including minimum wage, overtime, and meal and rest period requirements), employee benefits, social security contributions, taxes, and penalties.

It’s worth reemphasizing this: Uber doesn’t want to pay drivers to take 15-minute rest breaks every few hours because it would cost too much, even though all US employers are required to give hourly workers paid breaks under federal law.

In the filing, the company says that dissatisfied drivers could become a business liability, as recent protests in India, the United Kingdom, and the United States have interrupted business on the platform. Instead of outlining ways to make drivers happy, Uber suggests it will just get worse.

“As we aim to reduce driver incentives to improve our financial performance, we expect Driver dissatisfaction will generally increase,” the company stated.

That dissatisfaction is leading Uber and Lyft drivers to organize.

In March, hundreds of Uber and Lyft drivers refused to pick up customers for an entire day — part of a one-day strike to protest the company’s recent decision to slash pay rates for drivers in the area.

Uber had cut its per-mile pay by 25 percent in Los Angeles County and parts of Orange County. That means drivers are now earning 60 cents per mile instead of 80 cents. That decision pushed drivers, who were already scraping by, over the edge.

Hundreds of them swarmed the streets, chanting and picketing outside Uber’s office in suburban LA. They asked customers to use public transportation instead of using the apps.

“Help us end this neo-indentured servitude,” Sinakhone Keodara, one of the drivers organizing the strike, tweeted that day.

A spokesperson for Uber told me at the time that the company had revamped its pay formula so that drivers will earn about the same amount that they did before Uber last increased pay rates in September.

The latest strike comes at a key moment for the ride-hailing industry. Lyft recently launched its IPO, which converted the platform into a publicly traded company. Uber is next, and its initial public offering is expected to create a financial windfall for dozens of early investors who will turn into overnight millionaires. Meanwhile, drivers say they can barely make ends meet on poverty wages.

Bayumi and other drivers helped organize Wednesday’s strike with Rideshare Drivers United. The group has been active in Los Angeles for a few years and has organized strikes before, but their impact was limited by the small group of members. That has changed recently.

Within the past two years, the group has gone from 300 drivers to about 3,000. As part of their strike, drivers demanded that Uber reverse the 25 percent rate cut and guarantee drivers a $28-per-hour minimum rate.

That didn’t happen, but that doesn’t mean the pressure is dying down. Drivers in New York City have proven that forming labor unions isn’t the only way for workers to secure better pay.

The explosion of ride-hailing apps has been great for the startups’ investors — but not so great for actual drivers. Researchers say drivers in the US earn about $12 an hour, after deducting car expenses and gasoline.

In New York City, the unrestricted growth of these companies put serious financial strain on the city’s taxi drivers and has made it hard for all drivers to compete and earn a decent living.

Economists at the New School and the University of California Berkeley published a report in July with some limited pay data, and discovered something alarming: Driving for ride-hailing apps in New York City is not really a part-time gig for people who want to earn extra cash.

More than half of their drivers are ferrying around passengers on a full-time basis, and about half of all drivers are supporting families with children on that income. But their earnings are so low that 40 percent of drivers qualified for Medicaid, and about 18 percent qualified for food stamps.

The New School report showed that the average hourly wage for app-based drivers in New York was about $12. “The app companies could easily absorb an increase in driver pay with a minimal fare adjustment and little inconvenience to passengers,” they wrote.

The report helped drivers persuade city officials in December to pass the nation’s first minimum pay rate for drivers working with the four largest app-based firms: Uber, Lyft, Juno, and Via.

Starting in January, ride-hailing companies were required to start paying drivers around $17.22 per hour (after expenses) — about $5 more per hour than the previous average of $11.90 per hour, according to the Independent Drivers Guild, which represents about 70,000 Uber, Lyft, Juno, and Via drivers in the city. The new pay rate is calculated per ride, but the guild expects it to give full-time drivers an extra $9,600 a year. (Lyft and Juno are now suing the city, arguing that the calculated rate favors Uber, but said they are using a different formula to meet the minimum hourly pay rate.)

Because Uber and Lyft drivers are considered independent contractors and not employees, they are not subject to the city’s minimum hourly wage, which is now $15 per hour. But the new rules essentially get around that loophole and ensure that drivers are earning at least the minimum wage, with a few dollars extra to cover payroll taxes and some paid time off.

Uber and Lyft have pushed back against the pay increase, saying it would hurt competition and discourage drivers from taking riders out of Manhattan. The current lawsuits suggest that Lyft and Juno are not done fighting it (Uber is not part of the lawsuits).

But if there’s any moment for drivers to demand more, it’s now. Companies are having a harder and harder time finding workers to fill jobs, which means the competition for labor is getting fierce.

The US economy is currently experiencing a major labor shortage. There just aren’t enough workers to fill all the available jobs.

For nearly a year now, the number of open jobs each month has been higher than the number of people looking for work — the first time that’s happened since the Department of Labor began tracking job turnover two decades ago.

At the end of January, the US economy had 7.6 million unfilled jobs, but only 6.5 million people were looking for work, according to data released earlier this month by the US Department of Labor. This was the 11th straight month that the number of job openings was higher than the number of job seekers. And each month, the gap has grown.

Employers have been complaining about a shortage of skilled workers in recent years, particularly workers with advanced degrees in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) fields. Nearly every industry now has a labor shortage, but here’s the twist: Employers are having a harder time filling blue-collar positions than professional positions that require a college education.

The hardest-to-find workers are no longer computer engineers; instead, they are home health care aides, restaurant workers, and hotel staff. The shift is happening because more and more Americans are going to college and taking professional jobs, while working-class baby boomers are retiring en masse.

So, for once, low-skilled workers have the most leverage in the current labor market. Uber and Lyft drivers won’t have a hard time finding other jobs in today’s economy — which means there’s no better time for working-class Americans to demand better wages, benefits, schedules, and work conditions.

The Uber strikes will also test how much leverage gig workers have in making these demands, and how effective it is to organize without a labor union.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.vox.com/2019/5/8/18535367/uber-drivers-strike-2019-cities

2019-05-08 12:40:00Z
52780287870672