Jumat, 31 Mei 2019

Are You Ready for Amazon or Comcast to Be the Next Big Wireless Carrier? - Gizmodo

Photo: Getty

While the T-Mobile–Sprint merger still hasn’t gotten the green light from the Justice Department, the FCC has already approved the deal and as part of the FCC’s stipulations, T-Mobile/Sprint would be forced to sell off Boost Mobile. However, the more important question is trying to figure out which company would be interested in buying Boost and making a bigger push into the wireless market.

According to a recent report from Reuters, it seems one potential candidate is online retailer megacorp Amazon, which, according to sources familiar with the matter, is not only interested in buying Boost Mobile, but possibly acquiring wireless spectrum that the new T-Mobile/Sprint would need to also divest as part of the merger.

Advertisement

Currently, it’s not entirely clear why Amazon is suddenly interested in operating its own MVNO (mobile virtual network operator). However, it seems one of the big lures of the deal would be the ability to use T-Mobile’s wireless network to enhance its service for at least six years. And with Google already operating its own MVNO in Fi, it probably shouldn’t be a surprise that Amazon is entertaining the idea of doing the same.

That said, Amazon may not be the only company eye the potential future sale of Boost Mobile; based on a report from Bloomberg, it seems Comcast is also interested in acquiring Boost Mobile if and when a T-Mobile/Sprint merger gets approved.

For Comcast, the deal makes a lot more sense, as it’s already a player in the wireless space thanks to Xfinity Mobile. Currently, Xfinity Mobile’s service relies on a network of wifi hotspots and cell coverage that runs off Verizon’s 4G network, so the addition of Boost Mobile, its estimated 7 million subscribers, and added wireless spectrum would give Comcast and Xfinity Mobile a lot more resources to work with.

Advertisement

But where things get really interesting is, according to another Bloomberg report, in order for the Justice Department to approve the merger, T-Mobile/Sprint may have to help create a whole new national wireless carrier to ensure that even after the companies merge, there will be four major wireless providers instead of just three.

This would mean simply renting bandwidth from one of the other carriers wouldn’t be enough, as the new entity would need to operate its own network, including all the equipment, wireless spectrum, and cell towers necessary to make that happen. That would be a huge endeavor, even for companies with deep pockets like Amazon or Comcast.

If that did happen, it would mean living in a world where the U.S.’s four big wireless carriers are AT&T, Verizon, new T-Mobile, and either Comcast or Amazon. For a lot of people, that’s a chilling thought. Sure, right now it’s just speculation. But what if? Which company do you think would make a better—or worse—nationwide wireless carrier: Comcast or Amazon?

Advertisement

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://gizmodo.com/are-you-ready-for-amazon-or-comcast-to-be-the-next-big-1835147723

2019-05-31 14:49:00Z
52780305304076

Uber Lost $1 Billion In 1st Quarter, Hopes Profit-Slashing Price Cuts Ease Up Soon - NPR

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi says he expects Uber and Lyft will be easing off their price-slashing battle soon. Richard Drew/AP hide caption

toggle caption
Richard Drew/AP

For most companies, losing $1 billion in a quarter would be a big disappointment. But Uber's first report as a publicly traded company was actually better than it had warned investors to expect.

The ride-hailing and food-delivery giant brought in more than $3 billion in revenue in the first three months of 2019 — a 20% jump from the same quarter a year earlier.

Before going public earlier this month, Uber had told investors to be prepared for an even larger loss in the first quarter. Now, it's telling them it expects the price-cutting competition that has hurt its profits to ease up soon.

Uber has burned through money for years by spending heavily on growth — offering financial incentives to attract new riders and drivers, and taking on the costs of expanding into new markets around the world. So far, that growth has never translated into profits.

Uber's IPO did not go well. Despite pricing its shares relatively conservatively, at least compared with early expectations, the company saw its stock drop immediately, and it finished day one lower than it started. Since then, Uber shares have never sold at the value set for the initial offering.

Wall Street liked what it saw in Uber's first earnings report. Its stock was up more than 1% in early trading Friday.

Uber's earnings report shows the company continues to expand rapidly, especially in Uber Eats, its food delivery branch. In South America, however, the company saw revenue shrink as it faces intense competition from rival Didi.

In the U.S., meanwhile, Uber is facing off with its smaller competitor Lyft.

Around the world, competition in ride-hailing is driving down prices and contributing to Uber's losses. In the earnings call on Thursday, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said he expects Uber and Lyft, at least, will be easing off their price-slashing battle soon.

"The competition is going to be more healthy," he said. "It's going to be based on brand and product and technology, which we think is the right way to compete, versus throwing money at the problem."

He also acknowledged that Uber has faced headwinds in the U.S. due in part to the tremendous damage to the brand over the past few years — marked by sexual harassment allegations, reports of illegal business practices, data breaches and other scandals.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.npr.org/2019/05/31/728576269/uber-lost-1-billion-in-1st-quarter-hopes-profit-slashing-price-cuts-ease-up-soon

2019-05-31 13:54:00Z
52780306414688

Uber's earnings print inspires new bull - Seeking Alpha

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Uber's earnings print inspires new bull  Seeking Alpha
  2. Uber loses $1 billion in quarter as costs grow for drivers, food delivery  Yahoo Finance
  3. Uber lost more than $1 billion in the first quarter  CNN
  4. How Uber Hopes to Profit From Public Transit  The New York Times
  5. Uber: Competition with Lyft Will Get 'More Healthy' From Here  TheStreet.com
  6. View full coverage on Google News

https://seekingalpha.com/news/3468261-ubers-earnings-print-inspires-new-bull

2019-05-31 13:10:00Z
52780306414688

Qualcomm has strong argument to win reversal of US antitrust ruling: legal experts - Yahoo Finance

FILE PHOTO: A sign on the Qualcomm campus is seen, as chip maker Broadcom Ltd announced an unsolicited bid to buy peer Qualcomm Inc for $103 billion, in San Diego, California, U.S. November 6, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo

By Jan Wolfe

(Reuters) - A rare public call by a U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) official for one of the agency's courtroom victories to be reversed, in a case of anticompetitive business practices by chipmaker Qualcomm Inc, charts a strong course for a judge's ruling to be overturned on appeal, some legal experts said.

FTC Commissioner Christine Wilson, an appointee of Republican President Donald Trump, wrote in the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday that the May 22 ruling against Qualcomm "radically expanded a company’s legal obligation to help its competitors" and was based on a strained interpretation of a 1985 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.

U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California said that Qualcomm's licensing practices had strangled competition in parts of the computer chip market, harming rivals, smartphone makers, and consumers. She ordered the San Diego-based company to renegotiate licensing agreements at reasonable prices, without threatening to cut off supplies, and ordered that it be monitored for seven years to ensure its compliance.

The Qualcomm case has been controversial since it began in the final days of Democratic President Barack Obama's administration, with the lone Republican FTC commissioner at the time saying it should not be brought.

The op-ed by Wilson, one of five FTC commissioners, will not have any legal weight as Qualcomm appeals Koh's decision but foreshadows strong arguments the company has to win on appeal, Geoffrey Manne, director of the International Center for Law and Economics, and several other antitrust lawyers said.

Other experts, however, said the decision was well reasoned and relied on detailed factual findings and determinations of witness credibility that appeals courts would be reluctant to second-guess.

FTC spokesman Peter Kaplan said the agency declined to comment.

The judge has not yet ruled on Qualcomm's request to put her decision on hold as it plans an appeal. The ruling sent Qualcomm shares tumbling and shaved $10 billion off the company's value.

Under U.S. antitrust law, companies generally can decide who they want to do business with. Even monopolists do not have a so-called "duty to deal" with competitors.


'ASPEN SKIING' U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE

    But the Supreme Court created an exception to this rule in the 1985 case, known as "Aspen Skiing," holding that exiting a profitable, time-tested business arrangement could be an violation of competition law.

    As Koh's ruling points out, Qualcomm once licensed its patents on industry-standard technology to rival chip makers, though the ruling does not make clear how extensive the practice was. Qualcomm abandoned the practice entirely in the early 2000s and began only licensing those patents to companies that make consumer devices such as smartphones, which contain chips.

    Koh said Qualcomm's about-face was "motivated by anticompetitive malice" and was the sort of conduct prohibited by Aspen Skiing.

In Aspen Skiing, a ski resort operator backed out of a profitable, long-standing agreement with a rival to jointly sell a combination lift ticket package.

The Supreme Court said the company appeared to be sacrificing immediate profits in hopes of stomping out a competitor in the long run.

Qualcomm argued at trial that it never granted so-called "exhaustive" full licenses to other chip suppliers. Requiring it to grant them now, as Koh has ordered, would force it into a new business arrangement, rather than require a return to a previous one, the company argued.

The FTC's Wilson wrote that Koh had misapplied the Supreme Court case. Under the judge's logic, "Aspen Skiing now means that if a company ever sells any product to any competitor, it then could have a perpetual antitrust obligation to sell every product to every competitor," Wilson said.

Jonathan Barnett, a law professor at the University of Southern California, agreed that Koh's decision was in danger of being overturned by an appeals court.

    The exception created by Aspen Skiing was supposed to be "very narrow," Barnett said. In a 2004 case involving Verizon Communications Inc, the high court cast doubt on Aspen Skiing, saying it was "at or near the outer boundary" of antitrust liability.

Manne said Koh erred in comparing Qualcomm's change in licensing practices to the conduct in Aspen Skiing.

    The shift to device-level licensing "hardly originated with Qualcomm" and made a great deal of business sense because it was much more lucrative, Manne said.

But some legal experts said that Koh's heavy reliance on factual determinations, particularly findings that Qualcomm executives lacked credibility on the witness stand, made her ruling harder to challenge.

Appeals courts will not set aside a trial judge's factual findings unless there is "clear error" - a high standard that is difficult to meet.

Koh, for example, said in her decision that "many Qualcomm executives’ trial testimony was contradicted by these witnesses’ own contemporaneous emails, handwritten notes, and recorded statements to the Internal Revenue Service."

One Qualcomm in-house lawyer "pretended not to recall" details of a 2012 meeting until the FTC's lawyers played a recording from it, Koh said. And Qualcomm executives often responded with "fast and practiced narratives" when questioned by their own lawyers, Koh said.

"It was embarrassing and probably really damaging on appeal that Koh carefully documented the Qualcomm executives pretty clear lies in testimony," said Christopher Sagers, a professor of antitrust law at Cleveland State University.

Qualcomm said in a statement that it believes "a thorough examination of the evidence and the proper interpretation of the law will result in a reversal by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals."

Manne said that even under the deferential approach taken by appeals courts, Koh's decision was on thin ice.

"I definitely think she is incorrect on the law with respect to the duty to deal and Aspen Skiing, and she’s vulnerable to reversal on appeal," Manne said.


(Reporting by Jan Wolfe and Diane Bartz in Washington; additional reporting by Stephen Nellis in San Francisco Editing by Noeleen Walder and Grant McCool)

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/qualcomm-strong-argument-win-reversal-110403435.html

2019-05-31 11:08:00Z
52780306763830

Global stocks decline, bonds surge on Trump's Mexico threat - Investing.com

© Reuters. The German share price index DAX graph at the stock exchange in Frankfurt © Reuters. The German share price index DAX graph at the stock exchange in Frankfurt

By Karin Strohecker

LONDON (Reuters) - Safe-haven sovereign bonds surged and European stocks tumbled on Friday as investors feared President Donald Trump's shock threat of tariffs on Mexico risked tipping the United States into recession while disappointing China data added to the woes.

The yield on Germany's 10-year government bond - regarded as one of the safest assets in the world - fell to a record low while U.S. yields slipped to near multi-year troughs.

Markets also moved aggressively to price in deeper rate cuts by the Federal Reserve in 2019, parts of the curve inverted further, seen as a warning signal for recession in the world's largest economy.

Washington will impose a 5% tariff from June 10, which would then rise steadily to 25% until illegal immigration across the southern border was stopped. Trump tweeted the decision late Thursday, catching markets completely by surprise.

"Very clearly when we all thought that the main trade tensions in the world were between the U.S. and China or perhaps between the U.S. and Europe, we hadn't realised there will be another trade tension with Mexico...and it raises concerns about who the next country may be," said Andrew Milligan, head of global strategy at Aberdeen Standard Investments.

The investor mood darkened further when a key measure of Chinese manufacturing activity for May disappointed, raising questions about the effectiveness of Beijing's stimulus steps. This also sparked concerns over the health of the global economy more widely.

"It is a nasty slowdown, it looks likely to be taking longer than we thought. Many thought that the slow down would be in Q1 and the recovery in Q2, but clearly everything that we see in May is telling us this will be pushed back into Q3 or Q4," Milligan added.

Yields on the 10-year Treasury note quickly fell to a fresh 20-month low of 2.17%, while the dollar jumped more than 3% on the Mexican peso.

On stock markets, the pan-European dropped 1.6%, slumping to a more than three-month low with Germany's trade sensitive down 1.8%. All sectors were in the red, but falls were led by carmakers dropping nearly 3% while Volkswagen (DE:) and Fiat Chrysler - both significantly exposed to Mexico - tumbled 3.6% and 5%.

Spanish banks with exposure to Mexico - Santander (MC:), Sabadell and Bilbao - also suffered.

Wall Street - on track for the first monthly decline of 2019 - also looked in line for sizeable falls, with e-Mini futures for the pointing to a 1.3% drop on open.

MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan edged up 0.2%, but is still down a whopping 7.4% for the month. China's blue chip index closed a touch lower with hopes Beijing would now have to ramp up its stimulus containing losses. Japan's dropped 1.6% on the day and 7.1% on the month.

Looking at MSCI's All Country World Index , the toxic cocktail of trade war fears and economic worries has wiped nearly $3 trillion of global stocks in May.

Investors clearly reckoned that opening a new front in the trade wars would pressure central banks everywhere to consider new stimulus.

On Thursday, Federal Reserve Board of Governors Vice Chair Richard Clarida had said the central bank would act if inflation stays too low or global and financial risks endanger the economic outlook.

"What the Clarida comments have done is clarify in many people's minds the answer to the questions of whether low inflation proving more than transitory would itself be enough to get the Fed to ease – the answer appears to be 'yes'," said Ray Attrill, head of FX strategy at National Australia Bank.

"That served to reinforce prevailing market expectations that the Fed will be easing in the second half of this year."

Indeed, the case that the inflation slowdown was temporary took a blow when the core personal consumption expenditures index, the Fed's favoured measure of inflation, was revised down to 1% for the first quarter, from 1.3%.

Trump's tariff threat only added to the dangers and the market further narrowed the odds on Fed easing this year and next. Futures imply no less than 44 basis points of cuts by year end in the current effective funds rate of 2.38%.

BOND BID, YEN SURGE

Bonds extended their bull run with 10-year Treasury yields now down around a steep 35 basis points for the month and decisively below the overnight funds rate. U.S. 3-month yields were some 20 basis points above those on 10-year Treasury bonds, the biggest inversion since 2007.

Such an inversion of the yield curve has presaged enough recessions in the past that investors are wagering the Fed will be forced to ease policy just as "insurance".

Yet Treasuries are hardly alone in rallying. Germany's benchmark 10-year bond yield hit fresh record lows.

In currency markets, the dollar suffered the biggest one day fall against the safe haven Japanese yen since March at 0.8%. Against a basket of currencies, the dollar pulled 0.1% lower to trade at 98.013.

The euro also fell sharply against the Japanese yen and was down nearly 0.6% at 121.23 after touching the lowest since a Jan. 3 flash crash.

China's yuan is set for its worst month since July last year and was heading towards the crucial 7 per dollar figure. Sterling was plumbing its lowest level in nearly five month and poised for the biggest monthly drop in a year as the imminent departure of Theresa May as prime minister deepened fears about a chaotic divorce from the European Union.

In commodity markets, firmed 0.7% to $1,297.3 per ounce. Oil prices fell to a near-three month low on fears a global economic slowdown would crimp demand. was last down just over $1 at $55.57 a barrel, while futures lost nearly $2 to $65.09.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/global-stocks-decline-bonds-surge-on-trumps-mexico-threat-1883789

2019-05-31 09:07:00Z
CBMicmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmludmVzdGluZy5jb20vbmV3cy9zdG9jay1tYXJrZXQtbmV3cy9nbG9iYWwtc3RvY2tzLWRlY2xpbmUtYm9uZHMtc3VyZ2Utb24tdHJ1bXBzLW1leGljby10aHJlYXQtMTg4Mzc4OdIBAA

Hoping to make money in real estate? Here are 5 tips for a successful house flip - USA TODAY

TV shows can make flipping — when an investor buys houses and sells them quickly for a profit — look easy. 

Not so fast, say experts and flippers alike.

“There’s a lot of moving parts in house flipping with serious financial implications if you overlook something," says Audra Walters, a real estate agent at Front Porch Properties in Charleston, South Carolina. “Failing to get a good estimate for renovations or not securing proper permits could cause delays and lead to massive losses.”

For Jerryll Noorden, a former NASA robotics research scientist who now flips three to four houses at a time through his Connecticut real estate firm, the hardest part was finding the funding to buy properties.

“Asking other people, including lenders, for money was a horrifying thought,” says Noorden, who started flipping houses in 2016. “I found an investor forum online and asked, ‘If I find a deal below market value, would anyone be interested in paying for the house and repair costs and we split the profits?’”

Staying home: More baby boomers stay in their houses as they reach retirement, skipping downsizing

Where the affordable homes are: Homes for sale: Here are the most affordable ZIP codes in the US

While most laughed at the notion, one investor agreed. In the end, they made an $80,000 profit despite repair costs doubling and the project taking 11 months to complete.

 

House flipping can be lucrative when done correctly. Here are some steps to boost your chances for a successful flip.

Study the market

The best opportunities are found off-market and outside of sites known as Multiple Listing Services (MLSs), where brokers can list and see properties for sale, advises Nathaniel Butler, a marketing manager at Washington Capital Partners in Falls Church, Virginia.

“These properties can be found using off-market dealer platforms, wholesalers (people who find a property, get it under contract, and assign it to another buyer who closes on it), contractors who work on flips, and by 'driving for dollars' through neighbors with distressed properties.”

Don’t be afraid to enlist an agent, too.

“Find an agent who understands the local real estate market, takes the time to educate you, and can recognize a good opportunity,” says Robin Kencel, a real estate broker for Compass in Greenwich, Connecticut. “Understanding what the market will bear for the property in that location is the key to a successful flip.”

Ask fellow investors if they know of any agents who have experience working with house flippers. The upside for agents, Kencel says, is those who provide astute and savvy business advice are well positioned for a long-term relationship with the investor as they buy and sell properties. 

Find the right flip

Avery Carl, a real estate broker in Nashville, Tenn., flips houses and scours neighborhoods to find properties below market value.

“Look for houses that are not well maintained with cracked windows, peeling paint, and overgrown grass,” says Carl.

She eventually bought and flipped six properties over a few years, buying “lipstick flips” that only needed carpet and paint. Her strategy? Buy a $100,000 house, add $40,000-$50,000 in value, flip it, and net $15,000-$20,000 in profit. 

Timing is key says Kencel, the broker from Connecticut: “Look during the holidays, at the end of the year, and in the summer," periods when fewer people are hunting for houses. "Keep your eye on the ball when others are looking elsewhere.”

Set a budget and timeline

Noorden says first-time flippers must understand the costs associated with the entire transaction, plus the value of the house once the repairs are done.

“People lose money on closing costs, money-lending costs, seller’s agent commissions, holding costs, contingency costs, utilities, construction and rehab costs, and more,” he explains. “In order to account for these costs, you have to buy the house at the right price.”  

That means figuring out the after-repair value (ARV), which “is the projected value of the house after it is completely renovated,” Noorden says.

A lot of buyers use what’s called the 70% rule. 

Stefano Grottoli of Orange Sun Investments in New Jersey offers this example: “If the house you’re looking to buy will be worth $200,000 after it’s remodeled and you would have to spend $50,000 to rehab it, then you should pay no more than $90,000 to purchase the home.”

Let’s do the math:

$200,000 (ARV) X 70% = $140,000

$140,000 (70% of ARV) - $50,000 (Repairs) = $90,000 (Maximum purchase price).

“Of course, your first offer would be much less than $90,000, but even at that price, you’re on track to make a good profit if no other issues arise,” says Grottoli. “A good contractor can help you to determine repair costs, but make sure to hire an inspector before buying to see if there is any black mold, termite damage, an underground oil tank, or foundation damage.”

Either way, investors should always allow wiggle room in their repair budgets for unexpected or unforeseen expenses.

You also need to set a timeline.

Manage your team

Rehabbing a property is a complex undertaking. Hire a team of experts on each project including an architect, contractor, inspector, lender, CPA, real estate agent, and real estate attorney. Despite having these experts on your side, remember, you are in charge.

“Give contractors a detailed scope of work, with a budget per item, and deadlines for each phase for completion,” says Grottoli. “Never ever give more than 10% down before the actual work begins and don’t abandon the house to the contractors. Always supervise their work.”

Steer clear of over-improvements

It’s the No. 1 mistake many first-time flippers make, says Carl, the Nashville broker, who also buys and holds properties. “Does a 'B' neighborhood warrant the most expensive marble countertops? No, a nice-looking solid surface counter is fine,” she says. In addition, Carl says don’t become emotionally tied to a property.

“Do what needs to be done to get the value out of the property," she says. "But don’t make it a vanity project.” 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/05/31/real-estate-sale-house-flipping-tips/1268913001/

2019-05-31 09:01:00Z
CAIiEJp1J00Lpds7OaQQMKUh3JQqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowjsP7CjCSpPQCMM_b5QU

B.C. minimum wage to climb by $1.20 an hour Saturday, will hit $15.20 by 2021 - Global News

Minimum wage in British Columbia will increase by $1.20 to $13.85 for most low-wage workers in the province on Saturday.The 9.5 per cent jump follows a $1.30 increase in the minimum wage on June 1, 2018.The minimum wage for liquor servers is also climbing by $1.30 to $12.70 per hour, while the monthly minimum for resident caretakers will climb to $831.45, and the daily minimum for live-in camp leaders will climb to $110.87.Story continues belowREAD MORE: Report argues minimum wage increases won’t actually help B.C.’s working poor“Regular increases to minimum wages are one way government is helping to make life more affordable for people, while providing the predictability and certainty that businesses need,” said the Ministry of Labour in a media release.The province is hiking the minimum wage each June until it reaches $15.20 per hour in 2021. The separate liquor server minimum will also be eliminated.WATCH: McDonald’s employees protest for higher wages

from Business - Latest - Google News http://bit.ly/2HPjCnT
via IFTTT
May 31, 2019 at 02:44AM