Rabu, 04 September 2019

Bizarre Huawei press release claims the US is behind cyberattacks and employee threats - Yahoo News

Click here to read the full article.

Huawei has stepped up its counter-attack against the US-led ban on the company’s products, with a bizarre press release issued Tuesday that levied a number of sensational claims against the US while offering no proof to support them.

In the wake of news that the US Justice Dept. is launching additional investigations into the beleaguered Chinese tech giant over claims of intellectual property theft, Huawei accused the US in the press release of “unscrupulous” behavior. Behaviors that includes, among other things, the US supposedly launching cyberattacks against the company.

More from BGR

“For the past several months, the US government has been leveraging its political and diplomatic influence to lobby other governments to ban Huawei equipment,” the press release notes. “Furthermore, it has been using every tool at its disposal — including both judicial and administrative powers, as well as a host of other unscrupulous means — to disrupt the normal business operations of Huawei and its partners.”

Those tools include, according to Huawei, the US “launching cyberattacks to infiltrate Huawei’s intranet and internal information systems.” It also supposedly includes the deployment of FBI agents to the homes of Huawei employees to pressure them to collect dirt on the company, in addition to unnamed US citizens supposedly pretending to be Huawei employees “to establish legal pretense for unfounded accusations against the company.”

That’s not even the extent of it, with Huawei also claiming that the US is conspiring with companies that either work with Huawei or have a business conflict with it in order to try and bring unsubstantiated accusations against the company.

Huawei hasn’t released anything in addition to the press release yet by way of comment or supporting evidence to back up the claims in it. This all comes as the bad news has inexorably mounted this year for the company, which has had to confront the fallout of a US-led opposition campaign that stems from allegations of intellectual property theft and national security concerns.

The company punching back like this was probably to be expected, not that it’s had much effect as of yet. And the bad news keeps coming. Huawei’s upcoming Mate 30 flagship, for example, is set to launch on September 19, but Google has said it won’t provide a licensed version of Android for the device, effectively dooming it outside of China.

BGR Top Deals:

Trending Right Now:

See the original version of this article on BGR.com

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.yahoo.com/bizarre-huawei-press-release-claims-020533542.html

2019-09-04 02:16:26Z
52780372544908

10 Reasons to Buy Amazon Stock -- and Consider Never Selling - The Motley Fool

Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN) stock has been a fantastic investment. Along with crushing the market over the long term, shares of the e-commerce titan have also outperformed in recent years. Over the three-year period through Sept. 3, this growth stock has gained 132% -- more than three times the S&P 500's 41.6% return.

Despite its mammoth size -- its $890 billion market cap makes its stock the third largest on the S&P 500 index behind Microsoft and Apple -- there are countless ways the company can continue to grow.

Here are 10 reasons to buy Amazon stock and consider holding on forever -- or at least for a very long time.

An Amazon box coming down a conveyor.

Image source: Amazon.

1. It's led by a founder

Amazon is led by CEO Jeff Bezos, who founded the company in 1994. He's 55 years old, so investors can hopefully count on him remaining at the helm for at least a few more years.

A number of studies show that shares of founder-led companies tend to outperform in the stock market, often significantly so. A Bain & Company analysis, for instance, determined that the stocks of U.S.-based founder-led companies returned an average of 3.1 times more than than non-founder-led companies from 1990 to 2014. 

2. The CEO has a lot of skin in the game

As of Aug. 1, Bezos owned 57.78 million shares of Amazon. Those shares are worth $102.6 billion as of the stock's closing price on Aug. 30 and gives him an 11.7% stake in the company. With more than $100 billion of his money wrapped up in Amazon, he's extremely incentivized to make decisions to increase the stock's value over the long haul. Investors can feel confident that the Amazon CEO's interest is aligned with their interests.

3. Its intensive focus on the customer

Amazon's mission "is to be Earth's most customer-centric company," and by most counts, it seems to walk its talk. Its intense focus on keeping customers happy should continue to result in customers spending more money on its site.

4. Its fulfillment center network acts as a nearly impenetrable moat

Amazon has a few key competitive advantages, though its deepest and widest moat to keep competitors at bay is its fulfillment center network, which it has spent many years and tons of money building. The combined extensiveness and efficiency of this network is the core reason that Amazon is able to so speedily and cost-effectively deliver packages throughout the U.S. and in many parts of the world. In short, it's the key to the company's ability to fulfill its main Prime benefit: one-day free delivery. (In recent months, Amazon has been upgrading its standard free delivery benefit from two days to one day.)

View from above of an Amazon fulfillment center, showing solar panels on roof.

Image source: Amazon.

The company currently has 159 fulfillment centers in the U.S., with plans for 41 more, according to logistics consultant MWPVL International. These are humongous facilities, averaging about 741,000 square feet -- nearly 13 times the approximately 57,600-square-foot size of a professional football field. Beyond the U.S., the company has 189 additional fulfillment centers and plans for 13 more, with India (51), the U.K. (30), and Germany (25) leading the way.

It would likely be cost-prohibitive for any competitor to try to replicate Amazon's distribution network's geographic footprint. Moreover, even if a company was willing to spend billions doing so, it would still likely lag in efficiency, as Amazon was an early mover in using advanced technology, such as robotics, in its fulfillment centers.

5. It has a winning formula for funding expansion

Amazon Web Services (AWS), the company's cloud computing services business, has historically been extremely profitable. The company has used the cash generated from AWS to grow its empire. Having such a profitable business segment that is growing so briskly is a huge advantage that other e-commerce players -- such as Walmart -- don't have.

Putting some numbers next to this item, in the second quarter, AWS grew revenue 37% year over year and accounted for just over 13% of Amazon's overall sales, yet it comprised 68% of its total operating income. It's the dominant player in the cloud computing service space. In 2018, it had a 32% market share of this $80 billion global market, which grew 46% year over year, according to market research firm Canalys.

6. Its Prime-centric business model is "sticky"

Now let's pivot to another key component of Amazon's business model: its ultra-successful Prime loyalty program. Prime makes Amazon's business model "sticky," which means that it helps the company build tight relationships with its customers. For $119 per year (or $12.99 per month), customers can subscribe to Prime, which gets them standard free two-day shipping (which is in the process of being upgraded to one day); streaming of movies, TV shows, and music; and other goodies.

Amazon had an estimated 101 million Prime members in the U.S. as of December, according to a Consumer Intelligence Research Partners (CIPR) report. (The company doesn't disclose its Prime member data by country, though it did say in 2018 that it had more than 100 million Prime members globally.) Prime members are particularly valuable to Amazon because they spend more money on the company's site. They spend an average of $1,400 annually on Amazon, whereas customers who are not Prime members spend about $600, per CIPR.

7. Online shopping has plenty of room for growth in the U.S.

E-commerce sales as a percentage of total U.S. retail sales have been growing at a steady pace. Nonetheless, that figure is still "only" 10.7% as of the second quarter of 2019. In dollar figures, the U.S. e-retail market was worth about $554 billion in the same quarter. 

US E-Commerce Sales as Percent of Retail Sales Chart

Data by YCharts.

As the largest e-commerce player in the U.S., Amazon is poised to continue to capture an outsize chunk of future growth. In 2018, it captured nearly half of online sales growth in the country.

8. E-commerce also has much room for growth internationally

In 2018, online sales accounted for 12.2% of global retail sales, with this number expected to be 14.1% this year and reach about 22% by 2023. Considering that global e-commerce sales are projected to be about $3.5 trillion in 2019, a nearly 8-percentage-point rise in four years equates to a huge increase in market size (more than $276 billion) -- and that's if total retail sales only remain static. 

To put all those new dollars that should be up for grabs within four years into perspective, $276 billion is more than Amazon's current annual e-commerce sales. In the second quarter, the company's global e-commerce sales were $55.1 billion ($38.7 billion in the U.S. and $16.4 billion internationally), which equates to an annual run rate of about $220 billion. And, again, this is assuming the total global retail market doesn't expand in size, which is extremely unlikely. 

The fastest-growing online retail market is India, followed by Spain and China, according to Statista. Notably, Amazon is engaged in a particularly big push in India, where it has 51 fulfillment centers, the most in any country except for the U.S. 

9. It continues to expand into a wide array of new arenas

A silver Ring doorbell.

Image source: Getty Images.

Amazon continues to enter new turf. In 2007, it entered the grocery delivery business via its Amazon Fresh service, which it has gradually expanded. And in 2017, it spent more than $13 billion to acquire Whole Foods, which gave it a major presence in the brick-and-mortar organic grocery space and increased its grocery delivery muscle.

Last year, Amazon made two major acquisitions that underscore its ambitions in the huge healthcare and smart-home markets. It threw its hat into the $400-billion-per-year U.S. pharmacy market when it spent $753 million in cash to buy online pharmacy PillPack, giving it the ability to speedily deliver prescription drugs across the country. It also dropped $839 million in cash to acquire Ring, best known for its video doorbells. This purchase bolstered Amazon's smart-home technology business, centered on its market-leading Echo line of smart speakers that are embedded with its artificial intelligence (AI)-powered assistant Alexa.

10. Its efficiency should continue to increase thanks to driverless vehicles

Within about the next five years or so, fully autonomous vehicle are widely projected to be legal across the U.S. Investors can expect that Amazon will be an early adopter of this tech for at least some portions of its delivery operations, which should drive (pardon the pun) further increases in efficiency.

Moreover, the company might eventually be using drones for some lighter so-called last-mile deliveries -- or from its fulfillment centers to many customers' homes.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.fool.com/investing/2019/09/03/10-reasons-to-buy-amazon-stock-and-consider-never.aspx

2019-09-04 02:24:00Z
52780372060384

Selasa, 03 September 2019

Tesla driver was eating and drinking during publicized Autopilot crash, NTSB reports - Electrek

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has released findings regarding a crash involving a Tesla Model S on Autopilot and a fire truck that was highly publicized when it happened last year.

It turns out that the driver was eating and drinking coffee during the moments leading to the crash.

In January 2018, a Tesla Model S crashed into a Culver City Fire Department fire truck, and the incident was highly publicized with speculation that the accident happened on Autopilot.

The NTSB launched an investigation, and they released their report today, more than a year later.

Here’s their summary of the accident:

At about 8:25 a.m. on Thursday, January 22, 2018, the Culver City Fire Department and the California Highway Patrol (CHP) responded to a traffic crash involving a passenger car and a motorcycle in the northbound lanes of Interstate 405 (The San Diego Freeway) near Washington Boulevard. In response to the crash, a CHP police vehicle was stopped on the left shoulder of the southbound lanes and a fire truck was stopped ahead of the police vehicle, canted left facing, in the left High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane. The police vehicle and fire truck had their emergency lights activated. About 8:40 a.m., a 2014 Tesla S model sedan was traveling southbound in the HOV lane of I-405 and struck the rear of the stopped fire truck. When the crash occurred, the fire truck was unoccupied, and the driver of the sedan did not report any injuries. Statements from the driver and data downloaded from the Tesla after the crash indicate that the driver was utilizing driver assist technology when the crash occurred.

The NTSB was able to confirm that Autopilot was being used at the time of the crash.

They wrote on their report:

Data from the crash trip shows that for the majority of the time in which Autopilot [was] engaged, the driver did not have his hands on the wheel. In the final segment leading up to the crash, the driver had his hands off the wheel [for] 12 minutes, 57 seconds. A “place hands on the wheel” alert was given four times in the final segment. Immediately after each alert was given, the driver placed his hands on the wheel. The last alert was given about 9 minutes into the segment. About driver placed his hands on the wheel for the last time in the segment. When the crash occurred, the driver had his hands off the wheel.

However, this is an inaccurate description by the NTSB based on data from Tesla.

Tesla has no way to detect whether hands are on the steering wheel. All they can detect is whether the driver is applying torque on the wheel or not.

Therefore, they can never claim that “the driver did not have his hands on the wheel” as they do in this report.

Tesla did its own investigation and claims to have a witness who saw the driver being on his phone moments before the crash:

Staff from the Tesla corporate office obtained a written witness statement from a vehicle passenger who was traveling alongside the Tesla when the crash occurred. The witness stated that leading up to the crash, the Tesla Driver ‘appeared to be looking down at a cell phone or other device he was holding in this left hand.’ The witness further stated that the Tesla driver appeared to be touching the steering wheel with his right hand and was focused on the phone, not the roadway.

In an interview with the NTSB, the driver denies being on his phone at the time of the crash.

However, he does admit to having been drinking coffee and eating a bagel while driving on Autopilot leading up to the crash:

While he drove, he rested his hand on his knee while he touched the bottom of the steering wheel. As he drove, he had a bagel and a cup of coffee next to him. As he reached the stopped fire truck, the large vehicle ahead changed lanes. Although the driver stated that he was looking forward, he was unable to see the fire truck in time enough to avoid the crash. The driver states that he was not using his phone when the crash occurred. However, because after the crash, his coffee spilled and his bagel was smashed, the driver is not sure if his coffee or bagel was in his hand when the crash occurred.

The NTSB didn’t come to any specific conclusion about the cause of the accident.

Here’s the full report:

Electrek’s Take

I don’t like all the talk about the hands on the steering wheel and only detecting them for a fraction of the trip. Tesla owners know very well that even if Tesla doesn’t detect hands on the wheel, they may very well be on it.

It’s therefore not a great metric to determine whether they are paying attention.

However, the stuff about eating a bagel while driving and apparently the witness that Tesla found are clearer indications that there might have been a lack of attention.

When driving on Autopilot, it’s important to always pay attention and be ready to take control at all time.


Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.



from Business - Latest - Google News https://ift.tt/2ZNbwll
via IFTTT
September 04, 2019 at 04:17AM

Crescent Point stock jumps as analysts laud $912-million divestment in tough M&A market - Financial Post

CALGARY – In a depressed market for oil and gas assets, Crescent Point Energy Corp. announced deals Tuesday to sell $912 million worth of wells and properties in Utah and southeast Saskatchewan in a bid to repair its balance sheet.

“These transactions are a considerable step forward in our ongoing plan to focus our asset base,” Crescent Point president and CEO Craig Bryksa said on a conference call Tuesday announcing the transactions to sell production of 27,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day to unnamed buyers.

Crescent Point shares surged as much as 7 per cent to $4.48 per share after announcing the deals on Tuesday, even as the broader S&P/TSX Composite Energy Index fell roughly 1 per cent as oil prices declined. Analysts attributed the jump to Crescent Point managing to strike a deal at a reasonable valuation in a difficult environment for mergers and acquisitions in the energy industry.

“They actually got something done,” Eight Capital analyst Adam Gill said, adding the value of the transactions – $700 million for the assets in Utah’s Uinta basin and $212 million for the assets in southeast Saskatchewan – was reasonable given the challenges in striking deals in the sector.

Earlier this year, Calgary-based oilsands producer Cenovus Energy Inc. pulled a package of assets of the sale block when the offers it received were less than it was willing to accept.

Against this backdrop, analysts have been closely watching Crescent Point in its efforts to  deleverage its balance sheet through divestitures in a new strategy announced in Sept. 2018.

At that time, the company said it planned to cut its workforce by 17 per cent and reduce its debt by $1 billion to reduce costs.

“Overall, transacting at the metrics they transacted at, is pretty attractive in this market and better than they were trading at,” Eight Capital’s Gill said, adding that there’s not as much pressure on the company’s management team to sell assets after this deal.

Crescent Point’s Bryksa said the company would use the proceeds to reduce debt and buy more of its own shares, which he called a “highly attractive opportunity.”

The company’s share price has been cut in half in the last year, from $8 per share to the $4 per share range, as investors were tired of waiting for a Crescent Point transaction, amid a wider rout in Canadian energy stocks.

Bryksa said the company is planning to use 30 per cent of its free cash flow — that’s the cash it generates after accounting for expenditures — to repurchase its own shares. This year, the company is now on pace to spend $125 million for share buybacks.

“As we execute on further dispositions, we’ll continue to revisit this,” Bryksa said, adding the company would consider using more cash to buy shares if it was able to sell other assets currently on the block. However, he reiterated that Crescent Point is still focused on reducing debt, which stood at $3.5 billion at the end of the second quarter.

The company said it expects its net debt will fall to $2.75 billion by the end of this year, which is down from $4.4 billion prior to when Bryksa became CEO in Sept. 2018.

“This should all resonate with investors in today’s environment, with the potential for additional sales bringing the company’s leverage position much closer to what investors are looking for in E&P companies today,” Raymond James analyst Chris Cox said in a research note.

• Email: gmorgan@nationalpost.com | Twitter:



from Business - Latest - Google News https://ift.tt/2ZPJy8h
via IFTTT
September 04, 2019 at 03:01AM

Interfor to close Hammond sawmill in Maple Ridge at cost of 147 jobs - Vancouver Sun

Federal Court of Appeal to rule Wednesday on letting Trans Mountain pipeline appeals proceed - Global News

The Federal Court of Appeal says it will reveal Wednesday whether a new set of legal challenges to the Trans Mountain pipeline project can proceed.The federal government has twice approved a plan to twin an existing pipeline from Alberta’s oilpatch to the B.C. coast.Last year the Federal Court of Appeal tore up the original approval citing both an insufficient environment review and inadequate consultations with Indigenous communities.The Liberals say they fixed both problems and approved the expansion a second time in June.Story continues belowREAD MORE: Trans Mountain to resume construction on pipeline expansionEnvironment groups still say there are not adequate protections for endangered marine species that will be affected by tanker traffic picking up oil from a terminal in suburban Vancouver.Several First Nations say the federal government came into the most recent discussions having predetermined the outcome.The court will decide Wednesday on 12 requests to appeal the June approval.READ MORE: Trans Mountain restarting pipeline construction ‘not reason to celebrate’: Jason KenneyThe federal government bought the existing pipeline and the unfinished expansion work for $4.5 billion last year, promising to get it over the political opposition that had scared off Kinder Morgan Canada from proceeding.The move disappointed environmentalists, who say the global climate can’t handle more emissions from Alberta’s oilsands and the eventual burning of the petroleum they produce. The Liberals say they’ll use any profits from the project to fund Canada’s transition to a cleaner-energy economy.Sign up for our weekly Money123 newsletter

from Business - Latest - Google News https://ift.tt/2MQTv3y
via IFTTT
September 04, 2019 at 04:35AM

'Patient capital': Chinese firms commit to oil sands despite setbacks, poor results - BNNBloomberg.ca

CALGARY -- While some European and U.S. companies cut their exposure to the Canadian oilsands, China's Big Three oil giants -- CNOOC, PetroChina and Sinopec -- seem content to let their bets ride even if the results haven't been spectacular.

In 2018, PetroChina produced an average of just 7,300 barrels per day of bitumen from its MacKay River thermal oilsands project, although it was designed to produce 35,000 bpd. In June, its output was about 8,700 bpd.

The Beijing-based company paid $1.9 billion in 2009 for 60 per cent interests in the proposed MacKay River and Dover oilsands projects being developed by Athabasca Oil Sands Corp. (now just Athabasca Oil Corp.), then bought out the rest of MacKay for $680 million in 2012 and Dover for $1.2 billion in 2014.

"MacKay River is located in an area with complex geology, which creates challenges to heat up the reservoir to get the bitumen flowing," said spokesman Davis Sheremata in an emailed statement.

The company is drilling new wells and experimenting with various technologies to boost output, he said, adding a go-ahead for Dover has been put on hold until MacKay proves itself.

Still, "PetroChina Canada is committed to Canada for the long-term, having maintained its investments through economically challenging times."

CNOOC produced about 71,000 bpd from the oilsands in 2018, little changed from 66,800 bpd in 2014, shortly after it spent $15.1 billion to buy Calgary's Nexen Energy and its diverse portfolio of domestic and international assets.

"Our oil sands assets are an important part of our North American portfolio and we remain committed to our Canadian operations," CNOOC spokesman Kyle Glennie wrote in a brief email.

Meanwhile, Sinopec paid $4.65 billion to buy a nine per cent stake in the Syncrude oilsands mining consortium from ConocoPhillips in 2010 and its resulting production has been steady since, registering just over 27,000 bpd in 2018.

The Chinese energy majors employ "patient capital" and it seems unlikely they will leave the oilsands anytime soon, said Jia Wang, deputy director of the China Institute at the University of Alberta.

"The assets they bought may not be the most profitable or may require more capital intensive development. ... (but) these are large Chinese companies, they're not likely to become bankrupt," she said.

"They have been through thick and thin, and different cycles of boom and bust. These (oilsands) operations in the grand scheme of these massive companies are not the largest chunk of their business so they can afford to have a presence here without incurring too much loss."



from Business - Latest - Google News https://ift.tt/2LiWUok
via IFTTT
September 03, 2019 at 07:03PM