Rabu, 09 Oktober 2019

China said open to partial US trade deal despite tech blacklist - BNNBloomberg.ca

China is still open to agreeing a partial trade deal with the U.S., an official with direct knowledge of the talks said, signaling that Beijing is focused on limiting the damage to the world’s second-largest economy.

Negotiators heading to Washington for talks starting Thursday aren’t optimistic about securing a broad agreement that would end the trade war between the two nations for good, said the official, who asked not to be named as the discussions are private.

But China would accept a limited deal as long as no more tariffs are imposed by President Donald Trump, including two rounds of higher duties set to take effect this month and in December, the official said. In return, Beijing would offer non-core concessions like purchases of agricultural products without giving in on major sticking points, the official said, without offering further details.

S&P 500 futures rose 0.9 per cent on the news and the offshore yuan extended gains.

The Ministry of Commerce didn’t immediately reply to faxed questions.

The latest round of trade talks come just days after the White House announced the blacklisting of Chinese technology firms over their alleged role in oppression in the far west region of Xinjiang, as well as visa bans on officials linked to the mass detention of Muslims. At the same time a fight over free speech between China and the National Basketball Association, triggered by a tweet backing Hong Kong’s protesters, showed the widening gap between the countries.

“I think there might be big breakthrough in the coming trade talks as both sides have expressed good gestures and positive signals,” said Huo Jianguo, a former Chinese commerce ministry official who is now vice chairman of the China Society For World Trade Organization Studies. “The recent blacklist and sanctions from the U.S. is just another usual tactic to showcase that it has multiple tools in the trade negotiations in line with Trump’s maximum pressure policy. It is hardly surprising to us and we shouldn’t take it too seriously.”

poll image

What’s your expectation for this week’s China-U.S. trade negotiations?

Total Results: 0

Bloomberg News reported last month that the Trump administration has discussed offering a limited deal that would delay or even roll back some U.S. tariffs for the first time in exchange for Chinese commitments on intellectual property and agricultural purchases. Questions about the strength of the U.S. economy have lingered before Trump faces an election next year.

President Xi Jinping’s government is under pressure to stem the broadening conflict as the trade war adds to the downward forces on China’s slowing economy. At the same time, China has resisted changes to its own industrial and economic policies that could potentially weaken the Communist Party’s grip on the economy.

The trade talks have failed to make serious headway since negotiations collapsed in early May. Since then, China has ramped up its nationalist rhetoric as the U.S. has targeted national champions like Huawei Technologies Co.

The reaction of the Chinese state this week after an NBA team manager tweeted support of protesters in Hong Kong is a case in point, with broadcasters refusing to broadcast games watched by millions. China also vowed to retaliate after the U.S. took action against companies and officials it said were involved in oppressing Muslims in Xinjiang.

“The rising nationalism sentiment at home is creating hurdles for President Xi to make concessions in the upcoming trade talks with the U.S. in light of the NBA firestorm and Xinjiang sanctions,” said Suisheng Zhao, executive director of the Center for China-U.S. Cooperation at the University of Denver’s Graduate School of International Studies. “Even if China is willing to make some compromise, that space is limited.”

--With assistance from Dandan Li and Kevin Hamlin.



from Business - Latest - Google News https://ift.tt/2oueSwN
via IFTTT
October 09, 2019 at 04:28PM

General Motors falls to its lowest since June after reportedly making a second offer to striking workers - Business Insider

FILE PHOTO: General Motors assembly workers picket outside the General Motors Bowling Green plant during the United Auto Workers (UAW) national strike in Bowling Green, Kentucky, U.S., September 17, 2019. REUTERS/Bryan Woolston/File PhotoReuters

  • General Motors stock sank as much as 2.9% Tuesday after the company reportedly made a second offer to striking workers.
  • The automaker sent the proposal Monday after members of the United Auto Workers union rejected a first offer over the weekend, the Detroit Free Press reported. Details of the second offer are confidential and GM hadn't received a response from the union as of Monday night.
  • Negotiations between GM and UAW took "a turn for the worse" over the weekend, union vice president Terry Dittes said in a letter to members.
  • Watch GM trade live here.

General Motors stock tumbled as much as 2.9% Tuesday after reportedly making a second offer to striking members of the United Auto Workers union.

The automaker sent a second offer to UAW Monday morning after the union rejected a first offer over the weekend, the Detroit Free Press reported. The details of the new proposal are confidential, and GM was still waiting for the union's response as of Monday evening, two sources familiar with the matter told DFP.

The strike entered its fourth week Monday, and has already wiped out more than $4 billion from GM's market cap.

"These negotiations have taken a turn for the worse," UAW vice president Terry Dittes said in a Sunday letter to members. "We, in this union, could not be more disappointed with General Motors."

Read more: The General Motors strike is getting more expensive. It has likely cost the automaker more than $1 billion already.

Roughly 46,000 workers began the strike on September 16. The automaker's stock has fallen roughly 9% since then and now trades at its lowest levels since early June.

The union's leadership is asking for entry-level pay raises, improved health care, and a faster process for short-term workers to earn higher salaries. The requests arrive as GM looks to produce more electric and autonomous vehicles, a change that would endanger the job security of many striking workers.

A continued demonstration would further hit GM's third-quarter earnings, as the company can only make up for so much lost production. The automaker is scheduled to announce its latest quarterly figures October 29, and is likely to answer many questions regarding the strike during the related analyst call.

General Motors traded at $33.97 as of 12:50 p.m. ET Tuesday, up roughly 0.1% year-to-date. Shares have fallen 7.6% since the strike began on September 16.

The company has 16 "buy" ratings, six "hold" ratings, and no "sell" ratings from analysts, with a consensus price target of $47.78, according to Bloomberg data.

Now read more markets coverage from Markets Insider and Business Insider:

Third-quarter earnings season is on the horizon. These are the 7 companies best positioned to impress with their reports.

Domino's Pizza tanks as slowing sales growth drags third-quarter figures below expectations

eBay is ramping up its sales efforts to take aim at Amazon's giant advertising business

GMMarkets Insider



from Business - Latest - Google News https://ift.tt/2LV4tDo
via IFTTT
October 08, 2019 at 11:56PM

The close: Wall Street slumps as visa restrictions stoke U.S.-China worries - The Globe and Mail

Oil prices and stocks across major markets fell on Tuesday as tensions rose between China and the United States ahead of high-level trade talks, while the British pound sank on reports that Brexit negotiations were close to breaking down.

Gold and the yen rose, indicating an increased appetite for safe-haven assets.

Washington widened its trade blacklist to include some of China’s top artificial intelligence start-ups, punishing Beijing for its treatment of Muslim minorities and ratcheting up tensions ahead of trade talks in Washington this week.

Story continues below advertisement

“The headlines are painting a picture of a less optimistic tone to the trade talks this week,” said John Zaller, chief investment officer of MAI Capital Management in Cleveland.

“Anything less than a tariff delay would be a pretty big disappointment for the markets.”

An increase in U.S. tariffs to 30 per cent from 25 per cent on $250 billion worth of Chinese goods is scheduled for Oct. 15.

U.S. stocks briefly cut losses in choppy trading on Tuesday after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell suggested openness to further rate cuts and said the time has come to allow the Fed’s asset holdings to begin to expand again.

Powell also said the Fed would “soon announce measures to add to the supply of reserves over time.”

However, indexes soon reversed course to fall further in late trading after the U.S. State Department said it is imposing visa restrictions on Chinese officials for treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang.

The interest-rate sensitive financials index was down more than 1 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

Market expectations have increased that the Fed will cut interest rates by a quarter per centage point in October, according to CME Group’s FedWatch tool.

Those bets were bolstered on Tuesday by data that showed U.S. producer prices unexpectedly fell in September.

“The overall tone from the Fed is showing a little more concern,” said Willie Delwiche, investment strategist at Baird in Milwaukee.

“The Fed is trying to send a message of ‘we are paying attention and we are on top of this, and we are going to focus on the mission and not the politics,’” he added.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 314.59 points, or 1.19 per cent, to 26,163.43, the S&P 500 lost 45.8 points, or 1.56 per cent, to 2,892.99 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 132.52 points, or 1.67 per cent, to 7,823.78.

In Toronto, the Toronto Stock Exchange’s S&P/TSX composite index was down 127.80 points, or 0.78 per cent, at 16,293.95.

Story continues below advertisement

The energy sector dropped 3.8 per cent, tracking a slide in oil prices.

Nine of the index’s 11 major sectors were in the red, with industrials sector falling 1.3 per cent and financials sector slipping 0.7 per cent.

A bright spot was the materials sector, which added 1.3 per cent aided by shares of gold mining companies.

Leading the index were Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd., up 5.3 per cent, NovaGold Resources Inc., up 5.1 per cent, and Alacer Gold Corp., higher by 4.6 per cent.

Lagging shares were WSP Global Inc., down 6.5 per cent, Encana Corp., down 6.5 per cent, and Whitecap Resources Inc., lower by 5.9 per cent.

The pan-European STOXX 600 index lost 1.10 per cent and MSCI’s gauge of stocks across the globe shed 0.81 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

Buoyed by gains in Asia, emerging market stocks were little changed. MSCI’s broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan closed just 0.24 per cent higher. Japan’s Nikkei rose 0.99 per cent.

Investors of Chinese mainland stocks returned from a week-long holiday to boost the index by 0.3 per cent, but a private survey showed growth in China’s services sector at its slowest in seven months in September.

With the focus turning to trade talks, U.S. President Donald Trump said he hoped Beijing would find a humane and peaceful resolution to political protests in Hong Kong, and said that situation had the potential to hurt the trade discussions.

The flight to safety also pushed some bond prices higher, with German bund yields edging down. U.S. Treasury yields also fell as expectations grew for a Federal Reserve interest rate cut in October following a big drop in the U.S. producer price index and an intensification of trade tensions with China.

Benchmark 10-year Treasury notes last rose 4/32 in price to yield 1.5391 per cent, from 1.553 per cent late on Monday.

Oil prices slid on Tuesday as Washington’s blacklisting of more Chinese companies dampened hopes for a trade deal between the two countries, although unrest in Iraq and Ecuador lent some support to crude prices.

Story continues below advertisement

Early in the session, both Brent crude and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) rose more than 1 per cent. But at settlement, Brent was down 11 cents, or 0.2 per cent at $58.24 a barrel while WTI fell 12 cents, or 0.2 per cent, at $52.63.

Reuters



from Business - Latest - Google News https://ift.tt/2oueSgh
via IFTTT
October 08, 2019 at 04:50PM

AT&T to Sell Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands Operations - The Wall Street Journal

AT&T Inc. has agreed to sell its Puerto Rican and U.S. Virgin Islands businesses to Liberty Latin America Ltd. for $1.95 billion in cash, allowing the telecommunications giant to shave its debt load and move closer to repurchasing shares.

AT&T’s operation in Puerto Rico provides cellular, landline and internet connections. It had 1.1 million wireless subscribers. As part of the deal, about 1,300 AT&T employees will be transferred to Liberty Latin America.

...

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.wsj.com/articles/at-t-to-sell-puerto-rico-and-u-s-virgin-islands-operations-11570624070

2019-10-09 13:25:00Z
52780405204094

Johnson & Johnson Risperdal verdict: Company hit with $8B verdict after drug linked to boy growing breasts - CBS News

A Philadelphia jury has ordered medical company Johnson & Johnson to pay $8 billion dollars in punitive damages in the case of a man who said he developed breasts after taking the company's anti-psychotic drug Risperdal as a child. The case is unrelated to a string of big-money lawsuits the company is facing over its signature baby powder

In the Risperdal case, a jury found that Johnson & Johnson failed to warn 26-year-old Nicholas Murray of the drug's side effects. Murray claimed that taking the Risperdal as a child caused him to develop breasts, an incurable condition known as gynecomastia. Thousands of others have filed lawsuits alleging the same.   

Murray said he was prescribed the medicine at age 9 for symptoms related to autism spectrum disorder, despite the fact that the FDA's approval of the drug in the 1990s was to treat schizophrenia and episodes of bipolar mania in adults.

Attorneys for Murray alleged the company marketed the drug for unapproved, off-label use in children to increase profits, choosing "billions over children."

Johnson & Johnson denied the allegations, and said it's confident the ruling will be overturned. In a statement, the company said it was "precluded from presenting ... key evidence..." The company further claimed that evidence showed how the label for the drug "clearly and appropriately outlined the risks associated with the medicine." 

Murray's attorneys told "CBS This Morning" consumer investigative correspondent Anna Werner that the punitive damages were meant to deter the company from similar conduct in the future. They believe the decision will stand.

© 2019 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/johnson-johnson-risperdal-company-8-billion-verdict-boy-allegedly-takes-anti-psychotic-develops-breasts/

2019-10-09 11:40:00Z
52780404671673

Johnson & Johnson ordered to pay man $8bn over breast growth - BBC News

US drug firm Johnson & Johnson has been told to pay $8bn (£6.6bn) in punitive damages to a man over claims he was not warned that an anti-psychotic drug could lead to breast growth.

A Philadelphia jury made the award to Nicholas Murray, 26, whose case was one of thousands pending in the state.

His lawyers argued J&J's subsidiary Janssen put "profits over patients" in marketing the drug Risperdal.

J&J will appeal the ruling, which it said was "grossly disproportionate".

Professor Carl Tobias of the University of Richmond School of Law said he expected the large damages award to be lowered on appeal.

"A jury, if it's outrageous enough conduct, will award a big number and let the lawyers and judges work it out," he said.

However, Prof Tobias said the jury's verdict could mean the firm faces more large damages awards in other Risperdal cases.

"The kind of evidence in this trial may persuade another jury or judge to do something similar," he said.

The company is facing a series of complaints in the US for allegedly failing to properly warn of Risperdal's side effects.

The US giant is also facing court challenges over vaginal mesh implants and baby powder allegedly tainted with asbestos. Those cases are in addition to an ongoing legal battle over its role in the US opioid addiction crisis.

In August, Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay $572m after a judge in Oklahoma ruled that the company contributed to an opioid epidemic in the state by running a "false and dangerous" sales campaign. The firm said it will appeal.

More recently, it agreed a $20.4m settlement with two counties in Ohio ahead of a trial about the opioid crisis, scheduled to take place later this month.

In the Risperdal lawsuit, Mr Murray said he developed breasts after his doctors prescribed the drug in 2003 when they diagnosed him with autism spectrum disorder.

Risperdal is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, but doctors can legally prescribe medicine for any condition they see fit.

The company said it is confident the ruling will be overturned, and said the court prevented their legal team from presenting "key evidence" on the drug's labelling.

A jury in 2015 awarded Mr Murray $1.75m after finding the company was negligent in failing to warn consumers of the risks.

A state appeals court upheld the verdict in last year, but reduced it to $680,000.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/business-49982237

2019-10-09 11:06:06Z
52780404671673

Global Tax Proposal Widens Net Beyond Tech Giants - The Wall Street Journal

The new proposal would also affect makers of luxury goods and automobiles—among other products—that are based in Europe and other countries. Photo: franziska kraufmann/Shutterstock/european pressphoto agenc

The search for a new agreement on how countries should tax multinational corporations advanced Wednesday, as international negotiators presented a way of rewriting the rules that they expect finance ministers from the Group of 20 leading economies will support.

The proposal comes as tensions between the U.S. and other governments rise following the introduction or announcement of a series of special taxes on digital services that mostly fall on large U.S. technology companies. It appears likely to win the support of the U.S. administration, since the plan is partly based on White House suggestions.

Crucially, the new proposal wouldn’t just target technology companies that are predominantly American, but would also affect makers of luxury goods and automobiles—among other products—that are based in Europe and other countries.

The new rules would also give more taxing power to countries in which consumers are based, rather than where patents, licenses and brands are owned or where businesses have headquarters.

The new proposal comes from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which is guiding talks between 134 countries on how to rewrite company tax rules.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Do you think corporate tax rules need an update for the digital age? Do you think this compromise —which covers not just tech companies but also other multinationals, like luxury-goods and automobile manufacturers —will address those concerns? Join the conversation below.

At issue is the growing digitization of the global economy. Decades ago, when companies sold their products abroad, their profits came mostly from manufactured goods. Digital services don’t require a local physical presence, enabling tech companies to lower their tax bills by basing patents, licenses and trademarks—to which their profits are attributed—in low-tax countries.

In the U.S. case, the new rules would likely result in little overall change in taxation, since it is both a large host to intellectual property and a huge consumer market. China would likely be in the same position, while some large European countries may gain.

Those that are set to lose would include low-tax investment hubs such as Ireland and Switzerland, which are hosts to large amounts of intellectual property, but are relatively small consumer markets.

The OECD believes the proposal will prove acceptable even to those countries that stand to lose some tax revenue, since the alternative would be a free-for-all in which each country finds its own way of responding to digitization.

There is also a risk that differences over tax policy could become more entangled with the continuing trade disputes, heaping additional uncertainty onto a global economy that is already slowing. Significantly, the U.S. government is investigating a digital tax imposed by France under the same broad law the Trump administration relied on for its trade dispute with China.

“There will be massive unilateral measures if we don’t find a solution,” said Pascal Saint-Amans, the OECD’s senior tax official.

The proposal was sent to finance ministers from the G-20 on Wednesday, ahead of their meeting in Washington on Oct. 17 and 18. OECD officials expect their plan to receive the G-20’s blessing, although ironing out the details will be a big challenge.

That is because the OECD’s proposal lays out the broad outlines of the new rules, rather than the specifics that will determine how much each government stands to gain or lose, and how much companies will have to pay.

The new rules would only affect companies that have global revenue over €750 million ($823 million), but would exclude businesses in that category that extract raw materials, or which manufacture goods that are then used by other businesses, rather than sold to consumers. It would also include large technology companies that don’t sell directly to consumers, but sell advertising to businesses that do.

The OECD is proposing that governments agree on a profit rate for a company’s global operations that is routine, and a way to share out governments’ rights to tax profits above that level based on the total sales accounted for by each country.

That would be a significant change to the way tax bills are decided. Levies are currently determined by a “bottom up” process in which businesses interact with each country’s tax code and a series of international agreements intended to avoid taxing the same profit twice or giving companies too much leeway to avoid paying taxes altogether.

But tax negotiators aren’t taking a view on exactly how that formula for dividing up tax revenues should work and think it will likely come down to compromise.

“The truth is what countries can agree on,” said Mr. Saint-Amans.

Write to Paul Hannon at paul.hannon@wsj.com and Richard Rubin at richard.rubin@wsj.com

Copyright ©2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.wsj.com/articles/global-tax-proposal-widens-net-beyond-tech-giants-11570611600

2019-10-09 09:00:00Z
CAIiELl1dfVrbnrUPTQG2VdXq5AqFwgEKg8IACoHCAow1tzJATDnyxUwx4YY